In any event, if no such change is made within one month of the date of this order, I will determine a new company name as per section 73(4) of the Act and will give notice of that change under section 73(5) of the Act.Īll respondents, including individual co-respondents, have a legal duty under Section 73(1)(b)(ii) of the Companies Act 2006 not to cause or permit any steps to be taken calculated to result in another company being registered with an offending name this includes the current company. In accordance with s.73(3) of the Act, this order may be enforced in the same way as an order of the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session.
(ii) not cause or permit any steps to be taken calculated to result in another company being registered with a name that is an offending name.
(i) take such steps as are within their power to make, or facilitate the making, of that change (b) LIOYDS TSB FINANCIAL GROUP LTD and David Andrew Rizzo each shall: (a) LIOYDS TSB FINANCIAL GROUP LTD shall change its name within one month of the date of this order to one that is not an offending name Therefore, in accordance with section 73(1) of the Act I make the following order: In this case I can see no reason to exercise such discretion and, therefore, decline to do so.Īs the primary respondent has not responded to the allegations made, it is treated as not opposing the application. Under the provisions of this rule, the adjudicator may exercise discretion so as to treat the respondent as opposing the application. The primary respondent, before the end of that period, shall file a counter-statement on the appropriate form, otherwise the adjudicator may treat it as not opposing the application and may make an order under section 73(1). The primary respondent did not file a defence within the one month period specified by the adjudicator under rule 3(3). The letters sent to the co-respondent were returned “no such person”. The letter sent to the primary respondent by Royal Mail “Signed For” service was returned “not called for”.
The parties were granted a period of 14 days to request a hearing in relation to this matter, if they so wished. On 6 June 2022, the parties were advised that no defence had been received to the application and so the adjudicator may treat the application as not being opposed. On 6 June 2022, David Andrew Rizzo was joined as a co-respondent. The letters sent to David Andrew Rizzo by Royal Mail “Signed for” service and standard mail were returned “no such person”and “addressee unknown” respectively No comments were received from David Andrew Rizzo in relation to this request. On 19 April 2022, the Tribunal wrote to David Andrew Rizzo to inform him that the applicant had requested that he be joined to the proceedings. The copy of the application was sent by Royal Mail “Signed For” service and also by standard mail.
#Lloyds tsb online ban registration#
The company name LIOYDS TSB FINANCIAL GROUP LTD has been registered since 23 March 2017 under number 10685872.īy an application filed on 22 March 2022, LLOYDS BANK PLC applied for a change of name of this registration under the provisions of section 69(1) of the Companies Act 2006 (the Act).Ī copy of this application was sent to the primary respondent’s registered office on 19 April 2022, in accordance with rule 3(2) of the Company Names Adjudicator Rules 2008. For a change of company name of registration No.
0 kommentar(er)
